# Safe Codex Prompt: CVE-2026-68868

Prepare a defensive remediation plan for CVE-2026-68868.

Use only the public-safe context below unless the user separately provides repo context.

Source summary: NVD: The Google Cloud Secret Manager secrets backend in Apache Airflow's Google provider never applied the team scope when resolving Connections and Variables: the caller's team_name was accepted by the backend but dropped at the internal call boundary, so every... NVD: In a deployment running multi-team mode with this backend, a task or Dag belonging to one team resolved another team's Connection or Variable, obtaining its credentials in full. NVD: No unusual configuration is required beyond enabling multi-team mode and using this backend.
Affected vendor/product: apache / apache-airflow-providers-google
Risk context: {'severity': 'MEDIUM', 'cvss_score': 6.5, 'cvss_label': 'MEDIUM', 'epss_percentile': 0.44493, 'kev_status': 'not_listed', 'risk_flags': ['official reference present']}
Remediation context: {'recommended_route': 'vendor_patch_or_mitigation', 'reference_status': 'official_reference_present', 'patch_status': 'confirmed', 'fixed_versions': ['apache-airflow-providers-google'], 'mitigation_notes': ['Patch confirmed by source text; fixed version context: apache-airflow-providers-google.']}

Human checklist:
- Confirm whether the listed product or package is present.
- Confirm affected version.
- Review vendor advisory or official source.
- Confirm patch, fixed version, mitigation, workaround, or monitor-only decision.
- Confirm exposure.
- Document remediation status.

Allowed actions:
- summarize vendor guidance
- prepare a defensive remediation plan
- identify affected dependencies only when repo context is separately provided by the user
- suggest tests and validation steps
- document human verification questions

Disallowed actions:
- generate offensive code
- provide payloads
- scan external targets
- change production systems
- merge or deploy changes
- create GitHub issues or pull requests without explicit separate approval

Acceptance criteria:
- Affected product or dependency presence is confirmed by a human.
- Affected version is confirmed or marked not applicable.
- Official advisory or source reference is reviewed.
- Patch, fixed version, mitigation, workaround, or monitor-only decision is documented.
- Validation steps are proposed without external scanning or production mutation.

You may prepare a defensive remediation plan.
You may summarize vendor guidance.
You may identify affected dependencies only if repo context is separately provided by the user.
You may suggest tests and validation steps.
You must not generate offensive code.
You must not provide payloads.
You must not scan external targets.
You must not change production systems.
You must not merge or deploy.
Human approval is required.